Lowtech Graph lists low-tech options for every need of a home. Here you can compare them, find tutorials to build them, and link them together into a circular system. Why low-tech?

Secondary glazing (retrofit inner pane)

Passive

One of 6 ways to meet this need. Cost, carbon, footprint and rankings are relative to other solutions for the same need, not absolute.

Traps a still-air layer against an existing window instead of replacing the window. The considered version is a second pane held in a frame inside the reveal, in acrylic, polycarbonate or film, which keeps the view. The crude version is bubble wrap misted onto the glass, which costs almost nothing, goes up in minutes and gives up the view, so it suits a window nobody looks through. Same physics either way: the gain is the trapped air, not the material.

Build it

Cost
Low
Upkeep
Occasional
Skill to build
None
Lifespan
20-30 years, same sealed/hardware failure modes as primary glazing
Embodied carbon
Low
Space / material use
Low
Output timing
None
Skill to repair
Basic
Regulation (FR example)
Changing the external appearance of an existing building normally requires a prior declaration (declaration prealable) at the mairie; stricter rules and an architect consultation apply within a protected or heritage perimeter.

Inputs

none

Outputs

Compare the 6 ways to meet this need

Levels are relative to the other options for this need, not absolute. Fewer dots is lighter.

Sources

Limitations of this page

We don’t list sizing or quantities, as the yield of each technique depends on the quality of its build. The catalogue compares options but doesn’t dimension them. Regulatory notes are indicative, with a French example, and need to be confirmed locally.