Lowtech Graph lists low-tech options for every need of a home. Here you can compare them, find tutorials to build them, and link them together into a circular system. Why low-tech?

Compact rectangular footprint

Passive · New build only

One of 9 ways to meet this need. Cost, carbon, footprint and rankings are relative to other solutions for the same need, not absolute.

A simple, compact house plan, close to a square or a short rectangle, without wings or recesses. For the same floor area, a compact shape has less outside wall and roof through which heat can escape. It costs nothing extra and makes the house cheaper to heat.

Build it

Nothing separate is built here: this is a choice about how the home is designed or used.

Cost
Low
Upkeep
None
Skill to build
None
Lifespan
Matches structure lifespan (a form/massing choice, not a wearing component)
Embodied carbon
None
Space / material use
None
Output timing
None
Skill to repair
None
Regulation (FR example)
Part of the structure or footprint: covered by the building permit (permis de construire) for a new dwelling. Rural sites are additionally constrained by the commune's PLU zoning, outside a constructible zone, a new dwelling is generally refused.

Inputs

none

Outputs

Compare the 9 ways to meet this need

Levels are relative to the other options for this need, not absolute. Fewer dots is lighter.

Sources

No sources recorded yet.

Limitations of this page

We don’t list sizing or quantities, as the yield of each technique depends on the quality of its build. The catalogue compares options but doesn’t dimension them. Regulatory notes are indicative, with a French example, and need to be confirmed locally.